检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡安琪[1] HU Anqi(School of Law,Anhui University,230000,Hefei,Anhui,China)
出 处:《特区经济》2024年第6期107-110,共4页Special Zone Economy
基 金:安徽大学法学院硕士研究生优质生源创新项目(M080148001)。
摘 要:2020年修正的《中华人民共和国著作权法》第十二条第一款增加了“该作品上存在相应权利”这一权利存在推定。为了落实《中美经济贸易协议》第1.29条规定的精神,最高人民法院在《关于加强著作权和与著作权有关的权利保护的意见》之三以及《关于审理著作权民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第七条第二款规定了“权利归属推定”并延及邻接权人。但是,©这一版权标志后的姓名或者名称应否被认定为署名,应否适用于专有出版权,并没有得以解决。对此,应以立足国内实际需求并契合国际条约及双边协议的要求为出发点,通过司法解释修正立法规范中的相关表述以明确作者和邻接权人与作品的关系。Paragraph 1 of Article 12 of the Copyright Law amended in 2020 added the presumption of the exis-tence of rights that“corresponding rights exist on the work”.In order to implement the spirit of Article 1.29 of the CEPA,the Supreme People’s Court has provided for the“presumption of the attribution of rights”and the presumption is extended to neighboring rights holders in the Opinions on Strengthening the Protec-tion of Copyright and Copyright-Related Rights and the Article 7(2)of Interpretation of Several Issues on the Application of Law in Hearing Civil Disputes over Copyright.However,the question of whether the name af-ter the copyright symbol should be recognized as a signature and whether it should be applied to the exclusive right of publication has not been resolved.In this regard,based on the actual needs of China and the require-ments of international treaties and bilateral agreements,we should amend the relevant expressions in the legislative norms through judicial interpretation to clarify the relationship between authors and neighbor-ing rights holders and works.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3