Understanding the Human Rights of Modern Individuals—Revisiting Habermas’s Dual Critique and the Reconstruction of Intersubjectivity  

作　　者：杨畅 PAN Yingzhao(Translated) YANG Chang

机构地区：[1]Department of Philosophy,School of Humanities,Central South University [2]不详

出　　处：《The Journal of Human Rights》2024年第2期420-475,共56页人权（英文版）

基　　金：This article is a phased outcome of the research project“Research on Contemporary Chinese Human Rights Theory and Discourse”funded by the Scientific Research Fund of Renmin University of China (Special Funds for Basic Scientific Research of Central Universities)(Project Approval Number 22XNA006)。

摘　　要：Human rights are not only pivotal in depicting the relationship between individuals and communities but also a focal point of political philosophical concerns oriented towards reality. The inseparability of human rights from individual self-identity reveals a contradiction between practicality and historicity in understanding individuals, as highlighted in the debate between liberalism and communitarianism. In order to reconcile this contradiction, Habermas,drawing from German classical philosophy, examines practicality and historicity separately: while Fichte intertwines objectivity in self-identity, revealing the practicality of individuals but neglecting their real elements, Hegel interprets self-identity under the concept of unity,examining individuals from a historical dimension but letting rational rules dominate reality. Ultimately, Habermas reconstructs the process of modern individual self-identity from the theory of communicative action by critiquing the shackles of subjective philosophy. He not only reconciles the divergence between practicality and historicity in self-identity, but also elucidates the intersubjective core inherent in human rights.

关 键 词：human rights SELF-IDENTITY PRACTICALITY HISTORICITY INTERSUBJECTIVITY 

分 类 号：B516.59[哲学宗教—外国哲学]