本科专业评价的“内卷”困境及其优化路径  

The Practical Dilemma of“Involution”of Undergraduate Programmatic As⁃sessment and Its Optimization Path

作　　者：王恩浩 WANG Enhao

机构地区：[1]云南省教育科学研究院,云南昆明650021

出　　处：《高教发展与评估》2024年第4期8-21,I0002,I0003,共16页Higher Education Development and Evaluation

摘　　要：高校本科专业评价是个重要的学术问题,但更重要的还是一个需要付诸行动并且将改变高等教育发展方向的实践问题。解析云南省高校本科专业综合评价项目,可以清晰呈现出现阶段专业评价的“内卷化”倾向,以及由此产生的办学目标异化、操作自我矛盾和评建功能失位等现实困境。从学术理想与行政需求相冲突的二元角度辨析其内在机理,评价标准的学术探讨、专业办学的主权之争、参与评价的主观意愿等在现实中均屈从于行政管理的内在逻辑与期待,在此二元互动之下评价体系主动引发了“内卷”。秉承调和妥协之原则,定量监测与增值评价相配、行政意志与专业主权相依、多元评价与核心诉求相融应是未来高校本科专业评价的优化路径。Higher education undergraduate programmatic assessment is an important academic issue,but more importantly,it is a practical issue that needs to be put into action and will change the direction of higher education development.This paper,taking the Yunnan Annual Holistic Undergraduate Programs Assessment as a specific case,analyzes the current tendency of“internalization”of undergraduate program assessment and its practical dilemmas,such as alienation of academic goals,self-contradiction in operation,and dislocation of evaluation-construction functions.Then,this paper,from the dualistic perspective of conflicting academic ide⁃als and administrative demands,points out that the academic discussion of evaluation standards,the dispute over the sovereignty of higher education,and the subjective willingness to participate in the evaluation,are all subordinated to the internal logic and expectation of administration in reality,and the assessment system actively triggers“involution”under this dualistic interaction.Finally,based on the principle of reconciliation and compromise,this paper proposes the optimization path of the future assessment of undergraduate programs by matching quantitative monitoring and value-added evaluation,blending administrative demand and college ini⁃tiatives,and integrating multiple stakeholders’needs and core stakeholders’demands.

关 键 词：本科专业评价 以评促建 内卷化竞争 增值评价 多元评价 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]