检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张会平[1] 张雪 ZHANG Huiping;ZHANG Xue
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学外国语学院,吉林长春130024 [2]沈阳市第126中学,辽宁沈阳110002
出 处:《外语界》2024年第3期9-17,共9页Foreign Language World
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“中国英语学习者句法—语用界面结构习得研究”(编号20BYY209)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本研究从句法—语用界面视角,考察了中国英语学习者优先论元结构习得的类母语特征、非母语特征及其影响因素。结果发现:(1)学习者的论元结构句法特征习得已达到类母语水平,但仍表现出偏离、多选和不确定性等非母语特征。(2)优先论元结构理解上,各组学习者能够判断优先论元结构在语境中的恰当性,但只有高级组达到类母语水平;产出上,各组总体符合优先论元结构的限制原则,但未完全达到类母语水平。(3)非母语特征主要受形式—意义关联强度、母语迁移和语境等因素影响。研究验证了优先论元结构假说和界面假说,能为优先论元结构教学与学习提供有益启示。From the perspective of the syntax-pragmatics interface,this study examines native-like and non-nativelike features as well as influencing factors in the acquisition of preferred argument structures by Chinese English learners.The results are as follows:(1)learners achieve a native-like level in acquiring syntactic features of argument structures,yet they still exhibit non-native-like features such as divergence,optionality,and indeterminacy.(2)In terms of comprehension of preferred argument structures,all learner groups are able to judge the appropriateness of the structures in context,but only the advanced group reaches a native-like level;in production of preferred argument structures,all learner groups adhere to the constraints of the structures,but they do not fully reach a native-like level.(3)Non-native-like features of learners are mainly influenced by factors including the strength of form-meaning associations,language transfer and context.The study validates the Preferred Argument Structure Hypothesis and the Interface Hypothesis,and could provide valuable insights into teaching and learning of preferred argument structures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33