认罪认罚案件被告人滥用上诉权法律规制之探讨  

Discussion on legal regulation of defendant’s abuse of appeal right in guilty plea case

作　　者：徐阳[1] 王印[1] Xu Yang;Wang Yin(School of Law,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110136,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110136

出　　处：《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期35-40,共6页Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“轻罪化背景下程序出罪机制研究”(23BFX171)。

摘　　要：在我国认罪认罚从宽制度实施过程中存在被告人滥用上诉权的问题。被告人滥用上诉权有违认罪认罚从宽制度的设立宗旨,降低了诉讼效率,浪费了司法资源,有必要从法律上进行规制。我国应在借鉴域外规制认罪协商案件被告人滥用上诉权立法经验的基础上,结合我国司法实践,对认罪认罚案件被告人滥用上诉权问题进行法律上的规制,构建认罪认罚案件一审法院上诉理由过滤机制,同时建立认罪认罚案件二审法院上诉许可审查机制。处理好保障认罪认罚案件被告人上诉权和规制其滥用上诉权的关系,确保我国认罪认罚从宽制度有序运行。In the process of implementing the leniency system of guilty plea in China, there exists the problem of the defendant’s abuse of appeal right. The defendant’s abuse of power to appeal violates the purpose of the leniency system, reduces the efficiency of litigation and wastes judicial resources, so it is necessary to regulate it from law. On the basis of China’s legislative experience in regulating the abuse of appeal right by defendants in plea negotiation cases from outside the region and combining with China’s judicial practice, we should legally regulate the abuse of appeal right by defendants in plea cases, construct the filtering mechanism of appeal grounds of the original court of plea cases, and establish the review mechanism of appeal leave of the second court of plea cases. Dealing with the relationship between protecting the defendant’s appeal right and regulating the abuse of appeal right can make the system of leniency of guilty plea run orderly.

关 键 词：认罪认罚案件 被告人 滥用上诉权 规制 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]