民间资源、过渡性文本与民族文学批评的话语逻辑  

The Discourse Logic of Folk Resources,Transitional Texts and Ethnic Literary Criticism

作　　者：李长中 张栋 LI Changzhong;ZHANG Dong(School of Literature and Journalism,South-central University for Nationalities,Wuhan,Hubei 430074)

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学文学与新闻传播学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2024年第3期14-23,179,共11页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助重点项目“当代少数民族文学评价体系建设的中国路径研究”。

摘　　要：少数民族文学因源于民间文学资源而极具“介于文人创作与口头文学之间”的“过渡性文本”特征。当下的批评现场,形成了一种极为吊诡的批评怪象:一方面,人们在观念认知上承认民间文学是少数民族文学的源头活水,少数民族文学仅仅是从民间文学这个“源泉”中流出的涓涓细流而已;另一方面,研究者在批评实践中却孜孜不倦地以作家文学理论话语套用其上,将民间文学的结构性影响变成学术盲区。加之横移西方话语所形成的“路径依赖”,结果造成对少数民族文学与民间文学关系的切割,原本深植于灵气生动厚重生活实践中的少数民族文学,成了冷冰冰拒人千里的理论标本。少数民族文学研究需要还原民间文学资源,注重民间口头文论遗产的当代打捞,以构成少数民族文学批评的话语逻辑。Ethnic literature is characterized as a“transitional text”“between literati writing and oral literature”because it originates from folklore resources.In the current critical scene,a bizarre phenomenon of criticism has been formed:on the one hand,people recognize folk literature as the source of ethnic literature,and ethnic literature is only a trickle of water flowing from the“fountain”of folk literature;on the other hand,in the practice of criticism,it is tirelessly applying the theoretical discourse of literature to it,and the structural influence of folk literature has become an academic blind spot.In addition,the“path dependence”formed by the transverse transfer of Western discourse results in the cutting of the relationship between ethnic literature and folk literature.The ethnic literature,which was originally deeply rooted in the spirit of vivid and heavy life practices,becomes a cold and refractory theoretical specimen.Restoring the folk literature resources of ethnic literature and focusing on the contemporary salvage of folk oral literary heritage constitute the discourse logic of ethnic literature criticism.

关 键 词：民间资源 过渡性文本 批评逻辑 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]