法益论与构成论解释:负有照护职责人员性侵罪的司法认定逻辑  

Interpretation of Legal Benefit Theory and Constitutive Theory:The Logic of Judicial Determination of Sexual Assault by Persons with Nursing Duties

作　　者：刘畅 LIU Chang(Chongqing Shapingba District People's Procuratorate,Chongqing401331,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆市沙坪坝区人民检察院,重庆401331

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2024年第7期124-132,共9页Journal of Leshan Normal University

基　　金：四川网络文化研究中心项目“网络时代知识产权犯罪研究”(WLWH22-24)。

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(十一)》增设负有照护职责人员性侵罪,在一定程度上加强了未成年人性权利的刑法保护。在本罪的司法认定上应当理顺法益论与构成论两个基本面向的逻辑。法益论层面,身心健康说与纯粹的性自主权说均不能准确描述本罪的入罪理由,伦理关系限定下的性自主权说可以概括本罪的独有特征。构成论层面,“发生性关系”应当包括性交行为和猥亵行为。犯罪主体的特殊职责人员的范围也应当以伦理关系中的尊卑差异与年龄差距为标准加以限定。The Criminal Law Amendment(XI)adds the crime of sexual assault by persons with nursing duties,which strengthens the criminal law protection of minors'sexual rights to a certain extent.In the judicial determination of this crime,the logic of the two basic aspects of legal benefit theory and constitutive theory should be straightened out.At the level of legal benefit theory,neither the theory of physical and mental health nor the pure theory of sexual autonomy can accurately describe the reasons for the guilt of this crime,and the theory of sexual autonomy under the limitation of ethical relations can summarize the unique characteristics of this crime.At the level of constitutive theory,"having sexual relations"should include sexual intercourse and indecent acts.The scope of persons with special duties as the subject of a crime should also be limited by the criteria of hierarchical differences and age gaps in ethical relationships.

关 键 词：负有照护职责人员性侵罪 身心健康 性自主权 伦理关系 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]