指定居所监视居住制度实践与法治愿景的抵牾——废除此制度之提倡  

Conflicts Between Institution Practice of Residential Surveillance at Designed Places and Prospect of Rule of Law—The Advocacy of Repealing the Institution

作　　者：王芃 Wang Peng(People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100091)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100091

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第16期82-85,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：指定居所监视居住的发展历程饱受争议,在立法对人权保障不懈追求的同时,实践也暴露出其替代羁押功能并未实现、人权侵害态势严峻、监督救济机制运转失灵等诸多弊病。随着中国式刑事司法现代化进程不断深化,刑事强制措施风险控制的重心逐步从羁押转向技术管控,优化取保候审适用范围的可行路径及“非羁码”等新兴科技手段的成功实践表明,完备的羁押替代措施体系能够摆脱对指监的依赖。功能严重异化难以纠偏的指监制度与刑事司法现代化发展方向背道而驰,废除的必要性已不言而喻。The development of residential surveillance at designated places has been controversial.While legislation unremittingly endeavors to safeguard human rights,the practice of law discloses many maladies,such as failure to realize the function of alternative custody,the growing severeness of human rights violation,and malfunction of the supervision and relief systems,etc.With the continuous deepening of the modernization process of Chinese criminal justice,the focus of risk control of criminal compulsory measures has gradually shifted from detention to technical control.The feasible path of optimizing the scope of application of bail pending trial and the successful practice of emerging technologies such as“non-custodial measures”show that a complete system of detention alternatives can get rid of the dependence on designated surveillance.Residential surveillance at designated places,whose function has dissimilated so much from its original intention that it is hard to correct,runs counter to the modern development of criminal justice.That’s why it should be repealed.

关 键 词：指定居所监视居住 强制措施 羁押替代措施 人权保障 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]