《刑事诉讼法》第四次修改中的强制措施问题研究  被引量:5

Study on Compulsory Measures in the Fourth Amendment to Criminal Procedure Law

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈卫东[1] 王然[1] CHEN Weidong;WANG Ran(Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出  处:《浙江工商大学学报》2024年第4期5-16,共12页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

基  金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“深化司法体制综合配套改革的进展与成效研究”(23ZDA078)。

摘  要:刑事强制措施的适用在当前司法实践中暴露出诸多弊端,呈现与社会经济发展相脱节的态势。适逢《刑事诉讼法》第四次修改,在新时代的司法背景下,刑事强制措施的修改在契合国家犯罪结构变更、接轨国际刑事司法准则、适应数字技术的深度融合等方面具有重大意义。本次刑事强制措施的修改应当严格以羁押例外原则、比例原则、监督制约原则、权利保障原则为根本准则,旨在进一步完善强制措施体系,实现程序的正当化与规范化,提升我国刑事诉讼的法治化水平。修改的着力之处包括规范刑事拘留期限、确立社会危险性要件的核心地位并完善证明标准、构建逮捕听证程序、重构径行逮捕、扩大取保候审的适用范围及适用条件、着重考虑废除指定居所监视居住、全面改革羁押必要性审查、推进数字技术在强制措施领域的规范发展等。The application of criminal compulsory measures in current judicial practice reveals numerous drawbacks,indicating disconnection with economic development.In light of the fourth amendment to Criminal Procedure Law,the revision of criminal compulsory measures within the context of contemporary judicial practice is of significant importance.This revision aims to align with changes in the national crime structure,integrate with international criminal justice standards,and adapt to the deep integration of digital technology.The amendment to criminal compulsory measures should strictly adhere to the principles of the presumption against detention,proportionality,supervision and restraint,and the protection of rights.The objective is to further improve the system of compulsory measures,ensuring the due process and standardization of procedures,thereby enhancing the rule of law in China s criminal proceedings.The focus areas for this amendment include regulating the duration of criminal detention,establishing the core position of social danger elements and improving standards of proof,constructing arrest hearing procedures,restructuring direct arrests,expanding the scope and conditions for the application of bail,considering the abolition of residential surveillance at a designated location,comprehensively reforming the necessity review of detention,and promoting the standardized development of digital technology in the field of compulsory measures.

关 键 词:强制措施体系 非羁押性强制措施 羁押措施 人权保障 

分 类 号:D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象