检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡超[1] 任思慧 CAI Chao;REN Si-hui(Shandong Technology and Business University,Yantai 264005,China)
出 处:《山东工商学院学报》2024年第4期51-60,共10页Journal of Shandong Technology and Business University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“共同富裕目标下中国家庭财富不平等统计监测与政策调控研究”(22BTJ038)。
摘 要:利用2021年中国综合社会调查数据构造地级市收入机会不平等指数,结合北京大学数字普惠金融指数,搜集地级市的宏观经济数据,采用门限分位数回归模型研究数字普惠金融对收入机会不平等的门限效应和异质性影响。研究结果表明:第一,数字普惠金融发展显著降低收入机会不平等,但在收入机会不平等程度不同的地区数字普惠金融的影响存在差异;第二,数字普惠金融与收入机会不平等之间存在显著的门限效应,在收入机会不平等程度较低的地区,数字普惠金融低于门限值时,数字普惠金融对收入机会不平等的抑制作用较强,但高于门限值时,数字普惠金融对收入机会不平等的抑制作用减弱。Reducing income of opportunity inequality and promoting social justice is an inevitable choice for realizing common prosperity.In this paper,using the 2021 China General Social Survey data to construct an income of opportunity inequality index for prefecture-level cities,combining it with Peking University's digital financial inclusion index,collecting macroeconomic data for prefecture-level cities,we use the threshold quartile regression model to study the threshold effect and heterogeneity effect of digital financial inclusion on income of opportunity inequality.The results of the study show that:firstly,digital financial inclusion development significantly reduces income of opportunity inequality,but the impact of digital financial inclusion varies across regions with different levels of income of opportunity inequality.Secondly,there is significant threshold effect between digital financial inclusion and income of opportunity inequality.In regions with low levels of income of opportunity inequality,the dampening effect of digital inclusion on income of opportunity inequality is stronger when it is below the threshold value,but weaker when it is above the threshold value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112