《左传》人物繁称的褒贬与缘情  

The Comment of Characters and Yuanqing of the Complex Names in Tso Chuan

作　　者：夏业梅 XIA Yemei(School of Liberal Arts,Hefei Normal University,Hefei 230601,China;School of Liberal Arts,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]合肥师范学院文学院,安徽合肥230601 [2]南京大学文学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《广西科技师范学院学报》2024年第2期20-30,共11页Journal of Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University

摘　　要：《左传》对人物称谓的记载较为复杂,以名称、以字称、以谥号称、以封地称,章学诚称之“繁称”。《左传》繁称分两种情况:一是《左传》作者以称谓褒贬的史家书法为治史理想,关注到《春秋》称谓的细微变化,在《传》文中贴附上“寓诸褒贬”的史家书法观念;二是《左传》自身叙事在称谓上并未广泛实施史家书法,正如刘知几所言,“缘情而作”,根据其时民间的习惯称谓而作的直接记录。Using names,aliases,posthumous titles,and fiefs to address characters,the records of character titles in Tso Chuan are quite complex,which was referred to“complex titles”by Zhang Xuecheng.This can be divided into two cases.Firstly,the author of Tso Chuan took the historian’s methodology of comment as the ideal of history,paid attention to the subtle change of the title of Chunqiu,and attached the idea of the historian’s methodology of comment to the text of Tso Chuan.Secondly,the narrative of Tso Chuan itself did not widely implement the historian’s methodology of writing in the title,as Liu Zhiqi said,“it was made according to the situation”,and the direct record was made according to the customary titles of the folk at that time.

关 键 词：《左传》 繁称 史家书法 褒贬 缘情 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学] K225[历史地理—历史学]