检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭晓静[1] PENG Xiaojing(Textual Research Institute,Dunhuang Academy,Lanzhou 730030,Gansu)
机构地区:[1]敦煌研究院敦煌文献研究所,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《敦煌研究》2024年第3期102-113,共12页Dunhuang Research
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目《敦煌文献唐蕃文化交流史料整理与研究》阶段性成果(22JJD770033)。
摘 要:敦煌本法成讲授的《瑜伽师地论》笔记文献主要包括《瑜伽论手记》和《瑜伽论分门记》两部分,以此为题的写本约65个卷号,分藏于国内外等多机构。通过从文献学的角度对写本形制、抄写形式以及文字特征等方面的梳理,概括出写本的基本面貌。因听讲人不同,就有了不同版本的笔记形式,将各写本进行比对分析,以期进一步展现讲经笔记的理论特色和价值意义。Among Dunhuang documents there are two sets of notes taken on the Yogacara-bhumi-s astra written by Buddhist priest Fa Cheng as he prepared for a sermon,which were given the titles"Reading Notes on Yogacara-bhumi-sastra"and"Classifications of the Yogacara-bhumi-sastra"There are approximately 65 different numbered manuscripts on this topic collected in different institutions throughout the world.By examining the format,writing styles and scriptural features of these two manuscripts from the perspective of philology,the author summarizes the important features of the manuscripts and concludes that different versions of notes regarding the same Buddhist scripture were written because Fa Cheng was preparing sermons for different audiences.A comparison and analysis of notes written in preparation for sermons is very helpful for revealing the theoretical features and philological value of documents created at different times while treating the same topic.
分 类 号:K870.6[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] R877.9[历史地理—历史学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7