检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安恒捷 AN Hengjie(Shen Junru Law School,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 310000)
出 处:《教育发展研究》2024年第13期86-93,共8页Research in Educational Development
基 金:杭州师范大学科研启动费项目“当代中国基层社会治理法治化研究”(RWSK20211048)的部分成果
摘 要:在新《学位法》颁布的背景下,有必要引入合法预期保护原则,深入探讨学位撤销中的相关理论和实践困境。在学位撤销问题上引入合法预期保护原则,不仅能够优化教育法治体系、提高学位撤销行为治理的法治化水平,更有利于巩固学位获得者的权利救济基础,使学位撤销行为符合国家学位制度的一般要求,满足学术诚信机制与高校学术治理机制的发展趋势,体现学位制度的严肃性。在具体的制度设计上,应当坚持以尊重学术自主原则为前提,并充分发挥正当程序原则在学位获得者权利和学术利益救济方面的重要效应。Against the backdrop of the new Degree Law of the PRC being enacted,it is essential to introduce the principle of protection of legitimate expectations to thoroughly examine the theoretical and practical challenges in degree revocation.Incorporating this principle in the issue of degree revocation not only optimizes the legal system of educational governance and enhances the level of legal governance in degree revocation actions but also strengthens the legal foundation for the relief of rights of degree recipients.This alignment ensures that degree revocation actions comply with the general requirements of the national degree system,meet the development trends of academic integrity mechanisms and university academic governance mechanisms,and reflect the seriousness of the degree system.In specific system design,it is crucial to adhere to the principle of respecting academic autonomy and fully utilize the significant impact of the due process principle in safeguarding the rights and academic interests of degree recipients.
分 类 号:G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学] D922.16[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49