检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋洁 徐艳 孙建伟[1] 杨雷 温晓红[1] Jiang Jie;Xu Yan;Sun Jianwei;Yang Lei;Wen Xiaohong(The First People's Hospital of Huzhou City;International Branch of The First People's Hospital of Huzhou City,Huzhou 313000,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]湖州市第一人民医院 [2]湖州市第一人民医院国际分院,浙江湖州313000
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2024年第5期127-128,131,共3页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:浙江省教育厅教改项目(jg20190439);浙江省湖州市科技局资助研究(2018GYB76)。
摘 要:目的:探讨脑瘫康复带教采用Mini-CEX评估法联合PBL教学法的效果。方法:选取本医疗健康集团康复科2019年至2021年69位实习生,随机分为对照组和试验组,对照组采用常规教学授课法,试验组在对照组的基础上施以PBL教学,两组均采用Mini-CEX评估法评价教学效果。结果:与对照组相比,试验组在脑瘫康复实习的理论成绩、实践成绩均高于对照组(P<0.05),Mini-CEX评估7个核心能力分数均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在脑瘫康复带教采用Mini-CEX评估法联合PBL教学法优于常规教学法。Objective:To explore the effectiveness of using Mini-CEX assessment combined with PBL teaching method in cerebral palsy rehabilitation preceptorship.Methods:Sixty-nine interns from the Rehabilitation Department of our medical and health group from 2019 to 2021 were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group.The control group received conventional teaching methods,while the experimental group received PBL teaching in addition to conventional methods.The teaching effectiveness was evaluated using Mini-CEX assessment in both groups.Results:Compared with the control group,the experimental group showed higher theoretical and practical scores in cerebral palsy rehabilitation internship(P<0.05),and the scores of the 7 core competencies assessed by Mini-CEX were also higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of Mini-CEX assessment combined with PBL teaching method in cerebral palsy rehabilitation preceptorship is superior to conventional teaching methods.
关 键 词:Mini-CEX评估法 PBL教学法 脑瘫康复
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.173.30