检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜越 JIANG Yue
机构地区:[1]青海民族大学法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第7期104-108,共5页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
基 金:2024年度青海民族大学创新项目规划课题“被追诉人阅卷权问题研究”(04M2024140)。
摘 要:对于被追诉人的阅卷权,虽然在《刑事诉讼法》第39条第4款中提出了“核实证据”的规定,但对于被追诉人阅卷权还并未做出明确的规定。在现今的司法实践中,被追诉人阅卷权的行使也存在着重重障碍。当前我国正在积极推行认罪认罚从宽制度,但在认罪认罚案件中,时常存在着需要被追诉人自行辩护的情形,而被追诉人的阅卷权是被追诉人进行自行辩护的前提,故我国应对被追诉人的阅卷权进行明确的规定,以保证被追诉人更好的行使自己的辩护权,从而更好的推进认罪认罚从宽制度在我国的发展。For the right of the accused to review files,although the provisions of"verifying evidence"are put forward in the fourth paragraph of Article 39 of the Criminal Procedure Law,this right of the accused has not been clearly stipulated.Moreover,in present judicial practice,there are many obstacles to the exercise of the right.At present,our country is actively implementing the leniency system of guilty plea,but in the case of guilty plea,there is often a need for the pursued to defend by himself and the examination right of the prosecuted is the premise of the prosecuted's defending by himself.Therefore,the right of the prosecuted to review files should be made clear to ensure that they can better exercise their right of defending,thus better promoting thesystem for imposing lenient punishments on those confessing to their crimes and accepting punishments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.15.223