检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张玉婷 Zhang Yuting(School of Foreign Studies,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing,China)
机构地区:[1]首都经济贸易大学外国语学院,北京100070
出 处:《外国文学》2024年第4期72-84,共13页Foreign Literature
摘 要:对比分析安德森与福克纳的作品细节,回顾后者对前者的戏谑评价,可发现两位作家在作品中传达的地域观、种族观、血统观有明显差异,先后分别构成对优生学种族本质主义主张的容纳和批驳。对二者创作异见的彰显并非否认其风格的共性和关联,而旨在揭示他们对盎格鲁-撒克逊民族主义的不同立场,进而深度剖析两代美国作家写作视阈的动态传承和演进,更以此管窥20世纪初美国文学界与种族科学话语的跨界互动。A close examination of Anderson and Faulkner's works and a review of the latter's parodic comments on the former demonstrate the two writers'different views on region,race,and blood,with Anderson's initial accommodation and Faulkner's later refutation of the racial essentialism embedded in eugenics.This study does not intend to deny their stylistic similarities and connections,but to reveal their different positions on Anglo-Saxon nationalism,further unravel the dynamic inheritance and evolution of their literary visions,and meanwhile offer a glimpse into the cross-boundary dialogue between the early-20"-century American literature and the discourses of racial science.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7