检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈敏哲[1] 孟莹 张意灵 Minzhe Chen;Ying Meng;Yiling Zhang(Foreign Studies College,Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan,China;Suzhou Industrial Park Wencui Primary School,Suzhou,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学外国语学院,湖南长沙410081 [2]苏州工业园区文萃小学,江苏苏州215124
出 处:《外国语言与文化》2024年第2期140-153,共14页Foreign Languages and Cultures
基 金:国家社科基金项目“基于概念整合理论的英语时、体、情态语法范畴的语义互动研究”(17BYY184)。
摘 要:在形式聚焦教学中,显性口头纠正性反馈和隐性口头纠正性反馈(OCF)对外语语法教学的效果问题历来颇受争议。本文通过实证研究了元语言反馈(MOCF)和重铸反馈(ROCF)对中国高中生习得英语被动语态显性知识与隐性知识的影响。研究发现:MOCF和ROCF对中国高中生习得英语被动语态的显性知识与隐性知识都有促进作用,但对英语被动语态中不同难度规则的显性知识与隐性知识习得的促进效果不尽相同。MOCF和ROCF对促进习得英语被动语态中简单语法规则所产生的功效基本相似,但对习得其中的复杂语法规则,MOCF的效果则更胜一筹。In studies on Focus-on-Form instruction,no consensus has been reached about the effects of the explicit and implicit oral corrective feedback on foreign language grammar teaching and learning.Accordingly,this study examines the effects of metalinguistic and recast oral corrective feedback(MOCF and ROCF)on Chinese high school students’acquisition of the English passive voice.The results show that both MOCF and ROCF can promote senior high school students’acquisition of explicit and implicit knowledge of the English passive voice.Differences occur when the complexity of the grammatical rules varies.For the simple grammatical rules of the English passive voice,the effects of MOCF and ROCF are generally the same,but MOCF is more effective for the acquisition of the complex grammatical rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.135.237