检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:上海市人民检察院课题组 龚培华[1] Research Group of Shanghai People′s Procuratorate(Shanghai People′s Procuratorate,Shanghai 201999)
机构地区:[1]上海市人民检察院
出 处:《犯罪研究》2024年第3期92-99,共8页Chinese Criminology Review
基 金:2022年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题“司法工作人员相关职务犯罪侦办质效提升研究”(课题编号:GJ2022C05)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:自2018年修订的《刑事诉讼法》将司法工作人员职务犯罪的侦查权赋予检察机关,各级检察机关在制度层面以及实践层面进行了一系列的探索与尝试。根据最高人民检察院《关于人民检察院立案侦查司法工作人员相关职务犯罪案件若干问题的规定》,结合H市办案实践,从数据分析以及办理过程中发现的问题入手,梳理全国各地的有益探索,从理念转变、多层级侦查组织体系建立、人才培养机制完善、强化侦查保障、大数据赋能等多维度,提出提升司法工作人员相关职务犯罪侦办质效的建议。Since the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018,which entrusted the power to investigate duty⁃related crimes of judicial functionaries to the procuratorial organs,various levels of procuratorial organs have made a series of efforts and explorations at the institutional level and in practice.In accordance with the Provisions on Several Issues concerning the People's Procuratorates'Opening of Investigation into Relevant Cases of Duty⁃related Crimes of Judicial Functionaries issued by the Supreme People's Procuratorate,and based on the case handling practice of H City,this paper focuses on the issues found in data analysis and handling process,sorts out beneficial explorations across China,and puts forward suggestions for improving the quality and efficiency of the investigation of duty⁃related crimes of judicial functionaries from the perspective of conceptual change,the establishment of a multi⁃level investigative organization system,the improvement of talent training mechanisms,the enhancement of investigative guarantees,and the empowerment of big data.
关 键 词:侦查一体化 司法工作人员职务犯罪 侦办质效
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.25.212