检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐云 XU Yun(Department of Neurological Rehabilitation,Wuxi Rehabilitation Hospital,Wuxi Jiangsu 214000,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省无锡市康复医院神经康复科,江苏无锡214000
出 处:《中华养生保健》2024年第17期106-109,共4页CHINESE HEALTH CARE
摘 要:目的探讨针对脑血管意外后遗症患者,采用细节干预联合优质护理的效果。方法抽取2021年5月—2023年5月江苏省无锡市康复医院收治的80例脑血管意外后遗症患者作为研究对象,依据随机数表法将其分为干预组和对照组,各40例,其中对照组给予常规护理干预措施,干预组给予细节干预+优质护理干预,采用焦虑(SAS)和抑郁(SDS)自评量表评价患者的心理状态,采用SF-36量表评估患者治疗后的生活质量,比较两组患者护理满意度。结果护理前两组患者的SAS、SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理干预后两组患者的SAS、SDS评分均降低,且干预组的SAS、SDS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理前两组患者的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、活力评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预后两组患者的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、活力评分均降低,且干预组的以上维度评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脑血管依赖后遗症,在治疗过程中联合细节干预、优质护理,可显著提高治疗的效果,帮助病人减轻负面情绪,提高生活水平,应用价值显著。Objective To explore the effectiveness of detailed intervention combined with high-quality care for patients with sequelae of cerebrovascular accidents.Methods From May 2021 to May 2023,80 patients with sequelae of cerebrovascular accidents admitted to Wuxi Rehabilitation Hospital were selected as the research subjects of this article.They were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group based on their hospitalization number,with 40 patients in each group.The control group received routine nursing interventions,while the intervention group received detailed and high-quality nursing interventions,The psychological status of patients was evaluated using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and the Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS).The quality of life of patients after treatment was evaluated using the SF-36 scale,and nursing satisfaction was compared between the two groups of patients.Results There was no statistically difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups of patients before nursing(P>0.05).After nursing intervention,the SAS and SDS scores of both groups of patients decreased,and after nursing intervention,the SAS and SDS scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05);There was no statistically difference in physiological function,physiological function,physical pain,and vitality scores between the two groups of patients before nursing intervention(P>0.05).After nursing intervention,the physiological function,physical pain,and vitality scores of the two groups of patients decreased,and after nursing intervention,the scores of the intervention group in the above dimensions were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05);The nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group was 95.00%,while the nursing satisfaction of patients in the control group was 75.00%.The nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of detailed intervention and high-qual
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7