锦标赛还是资格赛?我国院士增选模式探究及机制分析  

Tournament or Qualification?Research on Academician Co-selection Mode and Mechanism Analysis

作　　者：张昊 刘丽娜 ZHANG Hao;LIU Lina(School of Economics and Management,Harbin University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150040,China;School of Economics and Management,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨理工大学经济与管理学院,哈尔滨150040 [2]哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《科学学与科学技术管理》2024年第7期183-198,共16页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(72074062);黑龙江省普通本科高等学校青年创新人才培养计划项目(UNPYSCT-2020202);黑龙江省博士后基金项目(一等资助)(LBH-Z19012)。

摘　　要：院士是我国科学技术方面和工程科技领域的最高荣誉称号,两院院士是推进高水平科技自立自强的重要力量。为揭示院士增选模式并探究其内在作用机制,以2007一2021年中国科学院与中国工程院8次院士增选过程中公布的历年名单为研究样本,从参评人员的候选次数、发表高被引论文、获得国家科技三大奖三方面出发,分别构建连续双重差分模型与带中介的多期双重差分模型,分析其直接影响及内在作用机制。结果表明:候选次数对院士当选概率产生正向影响,存在着明显的“排队”倾向,院士增选模式表现为锦标赛模式,发表高被引论文、获得国家科技三大奖在候选次数与院士当选概率之间起中介作用。在控制候选次数的情况下,发表高被引论文、获得国家科技三大奖能够显著提高院士当选概率。Academician is the highest honorary title in the field of science and technology and engineering science and technology in China,and academicians of the two academies are an important force in promoting high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement.Academician selection system directly affects the grassroots scientific and technological talent training standards,academician selection mechanism also reflects the entire scientific and technological talent selection system,in order to standardize the process of academician selection,the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering promulgated the corresponding selection of the implementation of the corresponding additional measures,to promote the academician title to further return to the honorary,academic nature.The selection process of academicians of the two academies is complicated,and each stage of the selection will be disturbed by different factors,which will affect the results of academician selection.Academician co-option mode as a race system and the form of selection becomes a key factor affecting the probability of election of academicians,participants in the academician co-option many times,the number of candidates will be formed to add up to explore in the final academician evaluation meeting,whether the number of candidates will become a priority to be considered,that is,whether there is a"queuing"tendency,and further judgment.To further determine whether the academician selection mode is a tournament or a qualification match,and to reveal the main influencing factors of academician selection,it is of great significance to standardize the process of academician selection and improve the academician system in China.In order to reveal the mode of academician election and explore its internal mechanism,we take the lists of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering published in the eight academician elections from 2007 to 2021 as the research samples and constr

关 键 词：院士增选 增选模式 候选次数 中介作用 双重差分 

分 类 号：C961[经济管理—人力资源管理] G301[文化科学]