姚名达和胡适关于章学诚研究的互动  

The Interplay of Yao Mingda and Hu Shi on the Research Road of Zhang Xuecheng

作　　者：张仲民[1] Zhang Zhongmin(Department of History,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学历史学系,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期77-87,共11页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“后现代转向与世界范围内的现代化理论检讨和反思”(项目批准号:22JJD770025)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：青年学者姚名达初入清华国学研究院即师从梁启超研究章学诚,短时间内便成果丰富,但他一直对先行者胡适的章学诚研究批评有加,认为自己的章学诚研究可以超越胡适。之后为出版自己的章学诚研究成果,并希望能够入职与胡适关系密切的商务印书馆,迫切的姚名达不得不改变态度,主动迎合胡适,进而帮助其修订《章实斋先生年谱》。在修订中姚名达完全忘记了自己昔日对胡适的批评,几乎全部尊重胡适的论断,对其疏漏也一笔带过。姚名达围绕章学诚研究与胡适的互动,包括他对胡适态度的转变情况,非常形象地显示了其为人为学情况,以及其学术取向同外缘环境的关系,由此也可管窥章学诚研究热潮在民初兴起的学术史脉络与取得的进展情形。Yao Mingda,a young scholar,initially studied under the guidance of Liang Qichao at the Tsinghua Academy of Chinese Studies,focusing on the research of Zhang Xuecheng.Despite achieving significant progress in a short span,he consistently voiced critiques of Hu Shi's prior studies on Zhang Xuecheng.Subsequently,in a bid to secure Hu Shi's endorsement,the eager Yao Mingda found himself compelled to align with the latter's perspectives,aiding in the revision of“Mr.Zhang Shizhai's Chronicle.”The ensuing dynamic between the two parties,revolving around their engagement with Zhang Xuecheng,vividly portrays Yao Mingda's scholarly demeanor,the interplay between his academic inclinations and the broader contextual factors,and the unfolding of the academic history and advancements within the Zhang Xuecheng research wave during the early Republic of China.

关 键 词：章学诚 内史 姚名达 胡适 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]