“纪检监察学”界域指认的偏误与匡正  

The error and rectification of the identification in the field of Discipline Inspection and supervision

作　　者：杨永庚[1] YANG Yonggeng(Marxism College,Xi’an Peihua College,Xi’an 710065,China)

机构地区：[1]西安文理学院马克思主义学院,西安710065

出　　处：《陕西行政学院学报》2024年第3期53-58,共6页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA134);陕西省社会科学基金项目(2024E010);西安廉政研究专项课题(LZ2401)。

摘　　要：当前“纪检监察学科建构”在学术界和理论界如火如荼的进行,但出现了建构界域的泛化和偏误。因此,对其界域的指认要以“事实生成”和“学科自身规定”为依据,以其政治性与意识形态性、以具有专业素质和能力的人才、专业语境和领域的生成、学科自身发展规律等匡正纪检监察学界域。目前在学科建设上要加强对中国共产党历史上廉洁思想的概括,提炼纪检监察学的基本概念、基本理论、基本思想,对纪检监察案件自身构成要件以及和法律案件构成要件的区别研究,实现不同视域和维度的纪检监察学科建构。it is contrary to“Discipline Inspection and Supervision Science is a science”that there are generalizations and errors in the boundary of construction.“Discipline Inspection and supervision”is a special social practice because it contains the party spirit and political nature and has a strong ideological attribute,the identification of its boundary should be based on“Fact generation”and“Discipline self-regulation”,Discipline Development Law to correct discipline and supervision academic field.At present,we should strengthen the generalization of history of the Communist Party of China Integrity in discipline construction and refine the basic concepts,basic theories and basic ideas of Discipline Inspection and supervision,the study on the difference between the elements of Discipline Inspection and supervision and the elements of legal cases,realizes the discipline construction of Discipline Inspection and supervision from different perspectives and dimensions.

关 键 词：纪检监察学 界域 界标 偏误 匡正 

分 类 号：D262·6-4[政治法律—政治学]