检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙兴玲 许翠萍 刘盎 王菲 乔冉冉 姚红星 王洪梅 Sun Xingling;Xu Cuiping;Liu Ang(School of Nursing and Rehabilitation of Shandong University,Jinan Shandong 250012,China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学护理与康复学院,山东济南250012 [2]山东第一医科大学第一附属医院
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2024年第14期26-30,共5页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的:构建护士应用重症护理超声技术核心能力评价指标体系,为护士的培养、考核和能力评价提供参考依据。方法:通过文献回顾、半结构式访谈形成评价指标初稿,采用Delphi法对全国15省市21家三甲医院的27名专家进行函询,归纳整理专家意见形成终稿,运用层次分析法确定评价指标权重。结果:纳入全国27名函询专家,专家问卷有效回收率分别为92.59%(25/27)、96.00%(24/25),专家权威系数(Cr)分别为0.88和0.89,肯德尔协调系数(Kendall′s W)分别为0.237和0.333(P<0.001)。最终构建评价指标包括7项一级指标、17项二级指标和68项三级指标。结论:本研究构建的评价指标体系具有较好的科学性和可靠性,可为护士培训、考核及任用提供参考依据。Objective:Construct an evaluation index system of the core competence for nurses in the application of critical nursing ultrasound technology,so as to provide a reference for training,assessment and ability evaluation of nurses.Methods:Literature review and semi-structured interviews were used to form a preliminary draft of evaluation indicators.Delphi method was used to consult 27 experts from 21 Grade Ⅲ-A hospitals in 15 provinces and cities in China,and expert opinions were summarized to form the final draft.Results:A total of 27 experts were included,and the effective response rates of questionnaires were 92.59%(25/27)and 96.00%(24/25),the expert authority coefficients(Cr)were 0.88 and 0.89,and the Kendall′s W coordination coefficients were 0.237 and 0.333(P<0.001).The final evaluation indicators included 7 first-level indicators,17 second-level indicators and 68 third-level indicators.Conclusion:The evaluation index system constructed in this study is scientific and reliable,thereby providing a reference for nurses′training,assessment and appointment.
关 键 词:DELPHI法 重症护理超声 核心能力 评价指标 层次分析法
分 类 号:R192.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112