检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆地[1] Lu Di(College of Architecture and Urban Planning,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
机构地区:[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,上海200092
出 处:《中国文化遗产》2024年第4期64-72,共9页China Cultural Heritage
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“面向不可移动文化遗产干预的可识别性原则的历史、理论与本土化应用技术体系研究”(项目编号:52278036)资助。
摘 要:可识别是历史真迹保护与干预公认的基本要求之一,但常常令从业者感到只是为了防止所谓的认知误导,从而只是一种道德洁癖,甚至只是一种特定的西方文化现象。本文认为可识别原则饱受质疑,实施不畅的核心原因是,从业者普遍没有意识到该原则的历史真迹的保护作用:既保护历史真迹应得的真迹身份、地位与显现,又是确保未来的遗产干预科学合理的预防性保护措施。本文不仅论证了可识别是必要的历史真迹保护措施,甚至是历史真迹保护的根基所在,而且从历史溯源与理论两方面的角度,扩展了对该原则多样化实施方式的认识。From Venice Charter to various rules formulated by different countries relating to the protection of and intervention in immovable cultural heritage,and to Principles for the Conservation of Wooden Built Heritage and other documents targeting specific types of heritage,recognizability has become a basic criterion for intervention on cultural heritage.However,due to the lack of fundamental research and disconnection between the code of practice within the industry and actual practices,the principle of recognizability is often questioned and boycotted by people working in the industry.This paper believes that the key reason for poor implementation of the principle of recognizability is that people working in the industry fail to realize the protective effects principle of recognizability on historic real relics.This paper analyses the protective effects of the principle of recognizability on historic real relics from two perspectives.Firstly,the confirmed identity of historic real relics ensures the function as the witnesses of culture and acknowledgment of history,making it possible for the relics to attract attention and receive protection.Such identity and acknowledgment not only serve as the foundation for protecting the relics but also imply that the identity,status,and representation of the relics deserve to be safeguarded.Unrecognizable additions to any historic relics imply not only that it is no longer possible to recognize historic real relics but also that there is no need for recognizability,which further implies that the protection of historic real relics will no longer exist.Secondly,only recognizability can enable the interveners to confirm the origins of various components of the heritage and their relative value,and to formulate scientific and reasonable plans for intervention.We may conclude that recognizability is necessary and even serves as the foundation for the protection of historic real relics.Based on the history review and the theoretical analysis,this paper points out that there are many
分 类 号:G112[文化科学] K86[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249