检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶宇杰 TAO Yujie(School of Humanities,Tongji University,Shanghai,200092)
机构地区:[1]同济大学人文学院,上海200092
出 处:《自然辩证法通讯》2024年第9期25-32,共8页Journal of Dialectics of Nature
摘 要:法国技术哲学家西蒙东借助“个体化”概念描绘了个体同其所处中域相交互的动态生成过程。他将文化与技术的对立置于这一前设下讨论,指出了二者的对立是关于“人-文化”与“人-技术”的对立。当下技术在资本语境中的迅猛发展不仅忽视了作为文化与技术的共同中介的人,从而迫使文化走向单一文化;也导致了技术本身与科学在效率导向的专门化道路上渐行渐远。有鉴于此,西蒙东借其技术哲学表明:个体化技术整合并协调文化中的诸要素,使其反哺以该文化为中域而实存的个体。正是在这种循环往复的生成运动中,才有可能解开单一文化与科技二者间的病态结扣。French philosopher of technics Gilbert Simondon utilizes the concept of individuation to describe the dynamic process of becoming in the interaction between the individual and its milieu(x).He discusses the opposition between culture and technics under the above premise and points out that such opposition is essentially a conflict between “human-culture” and “human-technics”.The rapid development of technics in capitalist society not only disregards humans who are the common intermediaries of culture and technics,thereby forcing culture to homogenize into mono-culture,but also leads to the fact that technics and science go hand in hand in the path of efficiency-oriented specialization.According to Simondon,the technics of individuation integrate and coordinate various elements in a culture so that it can feed the individual that exists in this culture in reverse.In this reciprocal movement of becoming,it is possible to unravel the knot between mono-culture and technoscience.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] G115[文化科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49