学位授予过程中的导师同意纠纷:性质、根源及纾解  

Research on Supervisor's Consent Dispute in Degree Awarding Process

作　　者：欧阳硕 OUYANG Shuo(Basic Education Research Office,Guangdong Academic of Education,Guangzhou 510035,China)

机构地区：[1]广东省教育研究院基础教育研究室,广东广州510035

出　　处：《现代教育论丛》2024年第4期103-112,共10页Modern Education Review

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金“学位授予过程中的导师同意行为及其规制”(2021M700495)。

摘　　要：在中国内地地区的学位授予实践中,研究生非经导师同意无法获得学位。这在把关学位论文质量的同时,也可能损害研究生的合法权益。在霍菲尔德法律关系理论的视角下,导师履行同意职责是其特权,任何其他人或组织无权利干涉,但此种特权不应对抗学位授予权的豁免。导师同意纠纷之所以频发,根源在于行为作出的时间点恰好位于研究生培养活动和学位授予活动互相联结的“中间地带”,由此导致学位授予程序空转以及研究生的权利救济无门。为了进一步纾解导师同意纠纷,建议导师在作出同意行为时遵守平等原则和程序正义原则,高校建立校内调解和校内申诉等权利救济机制,研究生恪守法定义务。In the practice of degree awarding in China's Mainland,postgraduate students cannot obtain degrees without the consents of their supervisors.This may damage the legitimate rights and interests of graduate students while checking the quality of dissertation.From the perspective of Hohfeld theory of legal relations,it is the privilege of the supervisor to perform the duty of consent,and no other person or organization has the right to interfere,but this privilege cannot resist the immunity of the degree granting right.The reason for the frequent occurrence of supervisor's consent disputes is that the time point of the behavior is located in the"middle zone"of the connection between graduate training activities and degree granting activities,which leads to the idling of degree granting procedures and the lack of remedies for graduate students'rights.In order to solve the problem supervisor's consent disputes further,it is suggested that supervisors should abide by the principle of equality and procedural justice when giving consent,colleges and universities establish rights relief mechanisms such as mediation and appeals,and graduate students should also obey awful duties.

关 键 词：学位授予 导师同意 韦斯利·霍菲尔德 导学关系 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学]