检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄巨臣 韦忠霖 HUANG Juchen;WEI Zhonglin
出 处:《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第8期93-107,共15页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:“指标”是一种兼有概念与政策工具意涵的手段、方法和机制,也是理解中国大学学术评价及其指标体系的一个关键视角。指标在中国大学学术评价中的应用与发展,有其独特的历史性演进过程与制度性形成条件。按照评价主体与被评价客体关系及其意图指向不同,可将大学学术评价指标分为政府主导、市场主导与大学主导等类型。通过对指标的生成、执行、考核与结果应用等阶段的考察,呈现其运作过程机理。同时,大学学术评价指标体系具有重要贡献,却也存在主体参与、方法选用以及测量过程等方面的局限。基于上述认识,提出治理指标的若干建议以及探讨了从日常性考察走向形成可能的“指标治理理论”议题。Indicators is an instrument,method,and mechanism that is both a conceptual and policy tool,and a key perspective for understanding academic evaluation of universities and their indicator systems in China.The application and development of indicators in academic evaluation of universities in China has its own unique historical evolutionary process and institutional formation conditions.According to the different relationships and intentions between the evaluator and the evaluated object,academic evaluation indicators in universities can be divided into government-led,market-led,and university-led types.In this paper,by examining the stages of indicator generation,execution,assessment,and application of results,the mechanism of the operation process of academic indicators of universities in China is outlined.In addition,based on the understanding that the academic evaluation index system has important contributions,but also has limitations in terms of subject participation,methodology selection,and measurement process,some suggestions for governance of indicators are proposed and the issue of going from daily examination to the formation of a possible“indicator governance theory”is explored.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49