超越著作权法:剽窃的性质与治理  

Beyond Copyright Law:The Nature of Plagiarism and Its Regulations

作　　者：谢晓尧 黄炜杰 Xie Xiaoyao;Huang Weijie

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院 [2]深圳大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2024年第8期81-98,共18页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：剽窃是学术伦理上的概念,是疏于归认、带有欺骗性的学术不端行为,正确理解其涵义必须从其对立面入手。反剽窃意味着遵守引证的学术规范,归认来源。反剽窃的功能不仅在于著作权保护,很大程度还是对知识的有效治理。学术伦理规范上的剽窃与著作权侵权分处不同的话语体系,在适用范围等方面存在诸多差异,不能简单替代和混同。我国《著作权法》将剽窃作为侵权行为之一,导致学术伦理被边缘化和矮化,给学术活动带来了混乱。剽窃的治理并不排除法律手段,但是法律能够发挥的作用和采用的方式有限,必须高度重视学术共同体的自律性制度建设,强化学术批判和学术声誉的功能。Plagiarism is considered to be a concept within academic ethics,and it is a form of academic misconducts with fraud and negligence.The implication of plagiarism must be understood from its opposite.Anti-plagiarism means abiding by the academic norms of citation,that is,"acknowledging sources".The function of anti-plagiarism extends beyond copyright protection to include effective way of knowledge management.On the other hand,copyright infringement is a legal issue,and it differs from plagiarism in many aspects,including their scope of application,and therefore,they cannot be simply substituted or confused.However,China's copyright law regards plagiarism as one form of copyright infringement,which leads to the marginalization and dwarfing of academic ethics,and brings confusion to academic activities.While the management of plagiarism does not exclude legal means,they should play their role modestly and restrainedly.Great importance should be attached to the construction of the self-discipline mechanism within the academic community and the function of academic criticism and academic reputation.

关 键 词：剽窃 学术伦理 著作权法 归认来源 知识治理 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]