超越“实体构成论”与“关系生成论”——关于“生命共同体”的生态本体论研究  

Transcending“Substantialist”and“Relationalist”Perspectives:An Ecological Ontological Study on the“Community of Life”

作　　者：曲一歌 孟建伟 QU Yi-ge;MENG Jian-wei(School of Marxism,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049;Tianfu College,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 610052,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学马克思主义学院,北京100049 [2]西南财经大学天府学院,成都610052

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2024年第7期33-38,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“科学与哲学深层关系问题研究”(19BZX026);中国科学院大学基金项目“系统观念视域下习近平生态文明思想教育研究”(E3E43505)。

摘　　要：以往关于生态本体论的研究,存在着两种截然不同并相互对立的研究范式:一是可谓“实体构成论”的研究范式;二是可谓“关系生成论”的研究范式。前者聚焦“实体”及其“构成”,而严重忽视“关系”及其“生成”;后者则聚焦“关系”及其“生成”,而大大消解“实体”及其“构成”。“生命共同体”的研究范式将不仅最大限度地吸取和利用二者的合理之处,从而达到创造性的综合,而且将最大限度地摆脱和纠正二者的困境和偏颇,从而实现创新性的超越。Previous studies in ecological ontology have presented two distinct and mutually opposing research paradigms:one can be termed the“substantialist”perspective,and the other the“relationalist”perspective.The former focuses on the“entities”and their“constitution”,while significantly overlooking the“relations”and their“generation”;the latter,conversely,emphasizes“relations”and their“generation”,while greatly undermining the importance of“entities”and their“constitution”.The research paradigm of the“community of life”will not only maximize the absorption and utilization of the their rational aspects,thereby achieving a creative synthesis,but also strive to maximize the elimination and rectification of their dilemmas and biases,thus achieving innovative transcendence.

关 键 词：实体构成论 关系生成论 生命共同体 生态本体论 研究范式 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]