测谎意见:概念澄清及证据资格辩护  

Polygraph Opinion:Concept Clarifying and Evidence Competency

作　　者：吕子婧 LÜZijing(Law School,Inner Mongolia University,Hohhot 010070,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古大学法学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010070

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期50-58,共9页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目“区块链证据规则研究”(22YJA820034)。

摘　　要：在立法层面我国尚未认可测谎意见证据资格,然而,随着测谎在司法实践中呈现出不断扩大的应用趋势,测谎意见在某些裁判中已被当作证据对待。测谎意见未能证据化的阻碍主要来自其准确性及合法性两方面。事实上,在准确性方面,随着测谎技术的发展完善,检验的程序规范性与结论准确率不断提升,测谎意见已能对诉讼证据采信和客观事实认定等方面提供强有力的保证。在合法性方面,虽然测谎行为本身缺乏明确的法律依据,但可以通过学理解释为其找到合法外衣,而且在取得被测人知情同意后,选择接受测谎意味着其本人对诸如隐私权等基本权利作出一定让渡。此时,测谎不构成对公民隐私权或身体自由权的侵犯。在法律层面赋予测谎意见证据资格,将其纳入法治轨道中,不仅可以消除法官心证不可测的消极影响,而且对统一司法实践、实现司法文明也有积极作用。At the legislative level,China has not recognized the evidence qualification of polygraph opinion.However,as the application of lie detection in judicial practice continues to expand,polygraph opinion has been treated as evidence in some judgments.The main obstacles to the evidentialization of polygraph opinion come from two aspects:accuracy and legality.In fact,in terms of accuracy,with the development and improvement of polygraph technology,the standardization of the examination procedures and the accuracy rate of the conclusions have been continuously improved.Polygraph opinion can provide a strong guarantee for the credibility of evidence admissibility and fact-finding.In terms of legality,although the act of polygraph test itself lacks a clear legal basis,legality can be vested in it through academic interpretation.Furthermore,after obtaining the informed consent of the person being tested,choosing to accept a polygraph test implies the willingness to make certain concessions regarding basic rights such as the right to privacy.At this point,polygraph test does not constitute an infringement on the citizen’s right to privacy or the right to physical freedom.Granting the evidence competency of polygraph opinion at the legal level and incorporating it into the legal system can not only eliminate the negative impact of the unpredictability of judicial discretion but also play an active role in unifying the judiciary and achieving judicial civilization.

关 键 词：测谎 测谎意见 证据资格 证据化 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]