论诉讼调解反悔权的观念纠偏与制度重构  

Study On the Conceptual Correction and InstitutionalReconstruction of the Right of Regret in Litigation Mediation

作　　者：奉鑫庭 刘林林 FENG Xing-ting;LIU Lin-lin(School of Law and Public Administration,Hunan University of Finance and Economy,Changsha Hunan 410205;International Business College,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian Liaoning 116025)

机构地区：[1]湖南财政经济学院法学与公共管理学院,湖南长沙410205 [2]东北财经大学国际商学院,辽宁大连116025

出　　处：《湖南财政经济学院学报》2024年第4期109-118,共10页Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：2022年湖南省普通高等学校教学改革研究项目“象牙塔里的职业养成:全真法学案例素材教学法研究”(项目编号:HNJG-2022-1230)。

摘　　要：在民事诉讼调解过程中,反悔权是当事人都享有的一项救济性权利。赋予诉讼调解当事人反悔权的目的,是确保调解的自愿性,具有正当性。但不受任何限制的调解反悔权会导致反悔权的异化,既不利于调解制度的精细化建构,也不利于调解实践取得实际成效。现有的规制路径难以从根本上解决调解反悔权的绝对化问题。应当对绝对主义的调解自治观加以扬弃,改采相对主义的调解自治观,并在制度上将无限的反悔权修改为有限的反悔权。In the mediation process of civil litigation,the right to renege is a remedial right enjoyed by both parties.Granting the parties involved in litigation mediation the right to retract is legitimate,as it is to ensure the voluntary nature of the mediation.However,the unrestricted right to renege on mediation will lead to the alienation of the right to renege,which is not conducive to the refinement of the mediation system,nor is it conducive to achieving practical results in mediation practice.The existing regulatory path is difficult to fundamentally solve the problem of absolutization of the right to renege on mediation.The absolutist concept of mediation autonomy should be abandoned and replaced by the relativistic concept of mediation autonomy,and the unlimited right to retract should be modified to a limited right to retract in the system.

关 键 词：调解自治 绝对主义 相对主义 反悔权 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]