检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方小兵 FANG Xiaobing
机构地区:[1]南京大学中国语言战略研究中心
出 处:《语言政策与规划研究》2024年第1期24-34,201,共12页Journal of Language Policy and Language Planning
基 金:国际中文教育研究重点项目“世界主要语言文化推广机构线上教学的实践与启示”(项目编号:22YH55B);国家语委2022年度重大项目“新文科背景下的语言学学科建设研究”(项目编号:ZDA145–7);国家语委2023年度科研项目“联合国语言政策80年演进与启示”(项目编号:ZDI145–89)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:语言规划取向是指语言规划进程中所持的基本立场、态度或倾向。西方语言规划从最初的问题取向,演变为后来的认同取向、权利取向、资源取向、生态取向,以及最新的人文取向。这些取向各有其理论优势和局限。本文在对比文明和文化两个概念的基础上,提出了文明取向语言规划的核心理念,即语言规划是人类维系文明和追求进步的工具,认为该取向的价值主要体现在“整体性和涵盖性”“长期性和历史性”“现代性和创新性”三个方面。文章建议将语言文明作为核心概念纳入中国语言战略理论框架,以助力中国语言规划自主知识体系的建构。Language planning orientations refer to the basic positions,attitudes,or tendencies adopted in the process of language planning.Such orientations in the Western academic community have evolved from problem orientation to identity orientation,rights orientation,resource orientation,ecological orientation,and finally humanistic orientation.Each of these orientations has its theoretical strengths and limitations.After comparing the concepts of"civilization and culture,"this paper proposes a civilizationoriented approach to language planning,i.e.language planning is a tool for humans to pursue progress.This orientation is valued for its"holism and inclusiveness,""longterm and historical perspective,"and"modernity and innovativeness."A theoretical framework for language civilization is here proposed based on the form-function and macro-micro dimensions.It suggests that language civilization be incorporated into the theoretical framework of China's language strategy as a core concept,thereby contributing to the construction of a self-sufficient knowledge system for China's language planning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.227.158