检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱韶华[1] 陈怡[1] 冯琦[1] 王婷婷 ZHU Shaohua;CHEN Yi;FENG Qi;WANG Tingting(The Library of Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院图书馆,上海200025
出 处:《江苏科技信息》2024年第15期94-99,共6页Jiangsu Science and Technology Information
基 金:市级医院科技论文评价方法研究,项目编号:2022SKMR-25。
摘 要:文章梳理了我国科技论文评价指标体系的研究现状,总结研究热点、把握研究趋势,为科技论文评价指标体系的完善和发展提供理论参考。采用CiteSpace R6.1可视化分析工具,围绕与“科技论文评价指标体系”相关的关键词进行了系统分析,旨在深入探讨当前研究的热点问题。研究发现,国内相关论文的研究主题主要包括科技论文评价体系指标、指标体系构建、多维指标、学术创新评价、评价改革等。首先,回顾了学术论文评价指标的起源和发展历程,包括传统的引用次数、影响因子等指标,以及近年来兴起的学术社交网络和科学影响力指数等新型指标。其次,通过对相关文献的分析,总结了当前学术界对于评价指标的研究热点和关注领域,包括学科差异、合作网络、知识转化等方面。最后,展望了未来学术论文评价指标的发展趋势,包括引入多维度评价指标、采用人工智能技术进行评估、推动开放科学运动等。The article summarizes the current research status of the evaluation index system for scientific and technological papers in China,summarizes research hotspots,grasps research trends,and provides theoretical references for the improvement and development of the evaluation index system for scientific and technological papers.The CiteSpace R6.1 visualization analysis tool was used to conduct a systematic analysis of keywords related to the“evaluation index system for scientific papers”,aiming to deeply explore the current hot research issues.Research has found that the topics of domestic related papers mainly include evaluation system indicators for scientific and technological papers,indicator system construction,multidimensional indicators,academic innovation evaluation,evaluation reform,etc.Firstly,the origin and development process of academic paper evaluation indicators were reviewed,including traditional indicators such as citation frequency and influencing factors,as well as new indicators such as academic social networks and scientific influence indices that have emerged in recent years.Secondly,through the analysis of relevant literature,the current academic research hotspots and areas of focus on evaluation indicators were summarized,including disciplinary differences,collaborative networks,knowledge transformation,and other aspects.Finally,the development trends of future academic paper evaluation indicators were discussed,including the introduction of multidimensional evaluation indicators,the use of artificial intelligence technology for evaluation,and the promotion of the open science movement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.92.14