“道德想象力”的当代美学阐释  被引量:1

“Moral Imagination” in Contemporary Aesthetics

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:韩存远 Han Cunyuan(the School of Chinese Language and Literature,Shandong Normal University,Ji'nan 250399,China)

机构地区:[1]山东师范大学文学院

出  处:《外国文学研究》2024年第4期47-58,共12页Foreign Literature Studies

基  金:国家社会科学基金优秀博士论文出版项目“当代英美文艺伦理思想研究”(22FYB042);国家社会科学基金重大项目“文学伦理学批评的理论资源与对外传播研究”(21&ZD264)。

摘  要:在当代英美学界,审美想象渐趋被赋予诸种道德功用,作为文艺伦理范畴的“道德想象力”也应运而生。相关论断大致有三。其一,想象力可在一定程度上化解道德概念的艰涩含混,通过感性体验的浸润来优化道德实践的有效性。其二,叙事艺术包孕着丰赡且崭新的道德蕴涵,依凭想象力的持续渗透而催动着道德思维方式的更新。其三,以文学为首的“虚构”及其衍生性想象在扩张道德知识方面意义显豁,极大地改善了道德经验的范围与强度。“道德想象力”以“情境”为媒介,常与“文学”联姻,具有不可取替的效能,之于文学伦理批评而言亦不啻于一种有益的前沿路向。Aesthetic imagination has increasingly been ascribed various moral functions, leading to the emergence of “moral imagination” as a category within literary ethics. There are three main assertions related to this concept. First, imagination can alleviate the abstruseness and ambiguity of moral concepts to a certain extent, enhancing the effectiveness of moral practice through the infusion of sensory experience. Second, narrative art encompasses rich and novel moral implications, promoting the renewal of moral thinking through the continuous influence of imagination. Third, “fiction,” spearheaded by literature, and its derivative imagination are significant in expanding moral knowledge, substantially improving the scope and intensity of moral experience. “Moral imagination,” mediated by “context” and often intertwined with “literature,” possesses irreplaceable efficacy, serving as a beneficial frontier approach for literary ethical criticism.

关 键 词:道德想象力 审美想象 文艺伦理 文学伦理批评 

分 类 号:I0-05[文学—文学理论]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象