检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊丙奇[1] XIONG Bingqi(21st Century Education Research Institute,Shanghai 200030)
出 处:《上海教育评估研究》2024年第4期25-28,共4页Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
摘 要:我国部分地区近年来推出中考复读生减分参加普通高中录取的政策。对这一政策的利弊需要加以分析,这一政策虽然可以保护应届初中毕业生的利益,以及一定程度上保障了中职招生,但是另一方面则会进一步刺激应试竞争,强化“一考定终身”,不利于给义务教育阶段的学生减负。为给学生减负以及缓解普职分流焦虑,应该扩大学生的选择权,包括考试选择权,以及多元的成才途径选择。Some regions in China have introduced the admission policy of the general high school for reducing the scores of re-takers in the high school entrance examination in recent years.This paper analyzes the pros and cons of this policy,and argues that although this policy can protect the interests of fresh junior high school graduates and ensure the secondary vocational enrollment to a certain extent,it will also further stimulate the exam competition and strengthen the belief of“one exam decides for life”,which is not conducive to reducing the burden on students in the compulsory education stage.This paper suggests that in order to reduce the burden on students and to alleviate the anxiety of diversion between general high school and vocational school,we should take measures to expand students’right of choice,including their rights to choose exam,and give them multiple choices to be talents in different fields.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49