检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵元斌[1] Zhao Yuanbin
机构地区:[1]北京大学信息管理系
出 处:《国家图书馆学刊》2024年第4期105-112,F0003,共9页Journal of The National Library of China
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国目录学史研究”(项目编号:23&ZD220)的研究成果之一。
摘 要:学术史建立是学科发展成熟的标志。目录学作为我国传统学问之一,对其学术史的梳理一直是学界关注的重点。中国目录学史已有研究的贡献聚焦于三个领域:中国目录学通史研究、中国目录学断代史研究和中国目录学家及学术流派研究。通过梳理分析发现,一方面,前人对中国目录学史研究尚存不足,包括:通史研究详古略今,断代史研究尚有缺疏,目录学家个体研究有待深耕;另一方面,学术年表等学术史基础资料建设函待加强。The establishment of academic history is a symbol of the maturity of disciplinary development.History of Chinese bibliography has always been a focus of academic attention.The contribution of the existing research focuses on three major aspects:general history of Chinese bibliography,chronological history of Chinese bibliography,Chinese bibliographers and academic schools.Through sorting and analysis,it is found that on the one hand,previous research on the history of Chinese bibliography still have shortcomings,including:a detailed ancient study and omitted modern study of the general history of Chinese bibliography,a lack of research on the chronological history of Chinese bibliography,and a need for further cultivation of individual research on Chinese Bibliographers;on the other hand,there is an urgent need to strengthen the construction of basic materials for academic history,such as academic chronology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15