微气泡冲牙器与传统脉冲式冲牙器的清洁效果对比研究  

Comparative study on cleansing effect of microbubble toothbrush and conventional pulsed oral irrigator

作　　者：岳科安 黄文霞 张明富 严贵华 杨常委 洪菲菲 尹路 YUE Ke-an;HUANG Wen-xia;ZHANG Ming-fu;YAN Gui-hua;YANG Chang-wei;HONG Fei-fei;YIN Lu(School of Materials Science and Engineering,Xiamen University of Technology,Xiamen 361024,Fujian Province,China;No.1 Department of Restoration,Stomotological Hospital of Xiamen Medical College,Xiamen 361008,Fujian Province,China;Fujian College Engineering Research Center for Dental Biomaterials,Fujian Medical College,Xiamen 361023,Fujian Province,China;Xiamen Key Laboratory of Stomatological Disease Diagnosis and Treatment,Xiamen 361003,Fujian Province,China;Beauty and Health Division,Xiamen Solex Co.,Ltd.,Xiamen 361021,Fujian Province,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门理工学院材料科学与工程学院,福建厦门361024 [2]厦门医学院附属口腔医院修复一科,福建厦门361008 [3]口腔生物材料福建省高校工程研究中心,厦门医学院,福建厦门361023 [4]厦门市口腔疾病诊疗重点实验室,福建厦门361003 [5]厦门松霖科技股份有限公司美容健康事业部,福建厦门361021

出　　处：《医疗卫生装备》2024年第9期67-72,共6页Chinese Medical Equipment Journal

基　　金：厦门市科技计划重大项目(3502Z20221023);厦门医学院创新课题(X202112631049)。

摘　　要：目的:比较微气泡冲牙器与传统脉冲式冲牙器的口腔清洁性能,为使用者选择提供依据。方法:使用90颗相同的3D打印树脂模型牙,随机分为微气泡冲牙器高速挡位(GN-H)组、微气泡冲牙器中速挡位(GN-M)组、微气泡冲牙器低速挡位(GN-L)组、传统脉冲式冲牙器高速挡位(W-H)组、传统脉冲式冲牙器低速挡位(W-L)组,每组18颗,进行重复实验。通过测试不同类型冲牙器和挡位的冲洗强度、菌斑清除和黏附物去除能力,评估微气泡冲牙器与传统脉冲式冲牙器的清洁性能。结果:2类冲牙器均能达到较大冲洗深度,牙齿表面的黏附物和菌斑经冲牙器的冲洗明显减少,其中使用微气泡冲牙器的实验组效果更好。5组的冲洗强度排序为GN-H组>GN-M组>W-H组>GN-L组>W-L组,菌斑的清除能力排序为GN-H组>GN-M组>GN-L组>W-H组>W-L组,黏附物的去除能力排序为GN-H组>GN-M组>W-H组>GN-L组>W-L组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:2类冲牙器均能有效清洁菌斑和黏附物,而微气泡冲牙器性能优于传统脉冲式冲牙器。Objective To compare the oral cleansing effects of the microbubble toothbrush and the conventional pulsed oral irrigator to provide references for users.Methods Ninety identical 3D-printed resin tooth models were grouped and subjected to repeated experiments,which were divided randomly into five groups including a microbubble toothbrush high-speed gear(GN-H)group,a microbubble toothbrush medium-speed gear(GN-M)group,a microbubble low-speed gear(GN-L)group,a conventional pulsed oral irrigator high-speed gear(W-H)group and a conventional pulsed oral irrigator low-speed gear(W-L)group,with 18 teeth in each group.The cleansing effects of the microbubble toothbrush and the conventional pulsed oral irrigator were evaluated in terms of irrigating strength and abilities for eliminating plaque and debris.Results Both the two types of water flossers were provided with high irrigating strength and effectively reduced plaque and debris on tooth surfaces,and the GN-H,GN-M and GN-L groups behaved better significantly than the remained groups.The order of the five groups was GN-H group>GN-M group>W-H group>GN-L group>W-L group for irrigating strength,GN-H group>GN-M group>GN-L group>W-H group>W-L group for plaque removal,GN-H group>GN-M group>W-H group>GN-L group>W-L group for debris removal,with all the differences being statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Both the two types of water flossers remove plaque and debris effectively,while the microbubble toothbrush gains advantages over the conventional pulsed oral irrigator.

关 键 词：微气泡冲牙器 脉冲式冲牙器 菌斑清除 黏附物去除 冲洗强度 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]