亨利恢复主体性的现象学进路及其问题——基于亨利对马克思经济哲学的再阐释  

Henry's Phenomenological Approach to Restoring Subjectivity and Its Problems——From His Reinterpretation of Marx's Economic Philosophy

作　　者：胡依凡 贾江鸿[1] HU Yifan;JIA Jianghong(School of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《济宁学院学报》2024年第4期39-44,共6页Journal of Jining University

摘　　要：米歇尔·亨利在其“生命现象学”中强调个体的主体性,并以此为进路对马克思的实践观点作了重释,主张个体的活劳动是经济价值的基础。基于此,亨利批评资本主义将抽象的经济范畴凌驾于主观实践之上,否认其在本体论上具有第一性,进而尝试在“共产主义社会高级阶段”中恢复个体实践在经济中的主体性地位。亨利的这种生命现象学解读对恢复经济现实中人的主体性具有重要价值,但其对主体性和内在性的片面强调也引发了诸多问题,需要加以解决。Michel Henry emphasized the subjectivity of the individual in his“phenomenology of life”.Furthermore,he reinterpreted Marx's practical view,asserting that the living labor of the individual is the basis of economic value.Based on this,Henry rejected capitalism's economy overriding abstract economic category over subjective practice,and denied its ontological primacy.Thereby,he tried to restore the subjective status of individual practice in the economy in the“advanced stage of communist society”.In this sense,Henry's interpretation of phenomenology of life has theoretical value to restoring the concept of human subjectivity in economic reality.However,the“one-sided emphasis”on subjectivity and immanence also causes many problems.

关 键 词：生命现象学 经济 主体性 实践 劳动 

分 类 号：B565[哲学宗教—外国哲学]