检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:左卫民[1] ZUO Wei-min
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院
出 处:《当代法学》2024年第5期38-49,共12页Contemporary Law Review
摘 要:我国刑事诉讼的比较研究大致经历了介译阐释、效法借鉴以及反思批判三个阶段,积累了较为丰富的研究成果,并呈现出研究进路日益多元、研究内容逐渐深化、研究目标实用主义导向等特征。然而,存在研究视角重文本轻实践、比较对象缺乏系统性、研究内容缺乏深刻性等不足,在一定程度上制约了比较刑事诉讼研究的进一步发展。未来,应调整研究进路、更新研究对象,在做好域外刑事司法实证研究的基础上,转换研究视角与立场,立足中国的现实需要,打造比较刑事诉讼的中国流派,传播中国刑事诉讼学者的国际声音,助力国际刑事诉讼规则的建立与对中国制度的认同。The study of criminal procedure law in China has a relatively deep basis of comparative law research.With the in-depth promotion of reform and opening up,the comparative criminal procedure research restarted along with China's convergence with the world,and has gradually entered into a period of development.The comparative law research paradigm has been frequently utilized and rich research results gradually accumulated.Overall,since the reform and opening up,the comparative research on criminal procedure has gone through three stages of foundation,development and deepening,showing the characteristics of increasingly diversified research paths,deepening research contents and pragmatism-oriented research objectives.Among them,the transplantation,learning or absorption of foreign criminal procedure legislation,including concepts,systems and techniques,is a main line running through it.This undoubtedly provides textual and theoretical support for us to master the foreign legal system and learn from their experience,and also has a certain positive influence on the development of Chinese criminal procedure legislation and knowledge system.However,from the perspective of research,the existing research generally has the problems of fixed idea and single perspective,and pays too much attention to the institutional text and lacks a comprehensive view of foreign criminal justice practice.From the perspective of the research's object,the"Western-centeredness"feature of China's existing research on comparative criminal procedure is prominent.From the perspective of the research's content,the existing research results are generally fragmented and rough,and many studies are on the surface of the system and practice,which are not systematic and profound enough.In the future,in addition to a deep understanding of the concepts and rules of foreign criminal justice,we should also start from the perspective of judicial practice,conduct empirical research on foreign criminal justice and pay timely attention to the latest development
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222