检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张超 高文仓 ZHANG Chao;GAO Wencang(Department of Oncology,Peixian People's Hospital,Peixian 221600,CHINA)
机构地区:[1]沛县人民医院肿瘤科,江苏221600 [2]浙江中医药大学附属第二医院肿瘤科
出 处:《江苏医药》2024年第8期831-833,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的观察吗啡静脉患者自控镇痛(PCA)治疗难治性癌性疼痛(癌痛)的临床疗效。方法难治性癌痛患者106例随机分为两组,分别采用吗啡静脉PCA(A组,52例)和口服吗啡缓释片镇痛(B组,54例),连续治疗5 d。评估治疗前和治疗第1、3、7天数字评估量表(NRS)评分,记录爆发性疼痛发作次数,观察治疗7 d内不良反应发生情况。结果与治疗前比较,A组治疗第1、3、7天NRS评分降低,爆发性疼痛发作次数减少,且均优于B组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。两组治疗7 d内不良反应发生率相仿(P>0.05)。结论吗啡静脉PCA治疗难治性癌痛的疗效明显,不良反应轻微,优于口服吗啡缓释片。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia(PCA)in the treatment of refractory cancer pain.Methods A total of 106 patients with refractory cancer pain were randomly divided into two groups and treated with intravenous morphine hydrochloride PCA(group A,52 cases)and with oral morphine hydrochloride sustained-release tablets(group B,54 cases).The treatment lasted for 5 days.The scores of numerical rating scale(NRS)were evaluated before and on the 1^(st),3^(rd)and 7^(th)day during treatment.The number of explosive pain attack was recorded.The adverse reactions of the two groups within 7 days during treatment were observed.Results The NRS score and the number of explosive pain attack in group A were decreased on the 1^(st),3^(rd)and 7^(th)day during treatment,which were better in group A than those in group B(P<0.05 or P<0.01).The incidences of adverse reactions of the two groups were similar within 7 days of the treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion Intravenous morphine PCA in the treatment of refractory cancer pain has better clinical efficacy than oral morphine with mild adverse effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49