反思与重构:论小额诉讼程序的有效适用——基于B省法院的实证研究  

Reflection and reconstruction:on effective application of small claims procedure-an empirical study based on the courts of Province B

作　　者：孙琳 SUN Lin(Law School,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学法学院,北京102488

出　　处：《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期440-448,共9页Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA144)。

摘　　要：实现案件繁简分流,统筹兼顾质量效率是改革者赋予小额诉讼程序的核心价值功能。然而,学界关于小额诉讼程序实现案件繁简分流的实际效果如何,是否削减司法公正等问题尚未达成一致意见。实证研究表明,受司法考核和降低诉讼费政策的影响,我国不同法院适用小额诉讼程序对案件繁简分流的实现效果和司法公正的保障程度,在修法前后以及降低诉讼费前后均存在差异。可见,小额诉讼程序并非使所有法院实现案件繁简分流的效果,也并非使所有法院司法公正均受到减损。因此,在辩证对待小额诉讼程序适用效果的前提下,精准确定降低诉讼费后程序适用的有效区域,科学运用考核机制,适当拓宽当事人的救济途径,是未来完善小额诉讼程序以及深化民事诉讼改革的方向。Realizing the diversion of cases into simple and complex ones and taking into account both quality and efficiency are the core value function that reformers have given to the small claims procedure.However,academics have yet to reach agreement on the practical effects of small claims procedures in streamlining and simplifying cases,and on whether they reduce judicial fairness.Empirical research shows that there are differences among the streamlining effects and the degree of protection of judicial justices when China′s different courts apply small claims procedure before and after the amendment of the law,due to the influences of the judicial examination and reduction of litigation fee policy.It can be seen that the small claims procedure does not achieve the effect of streamlining cases for all courts,and does not reduce the impairs for all courts.Therefore,under the premise of dialectical treatment of the effect of the application of small claims procedures,accurately determining the effective area of application of the procedures after the reduction of litigation fees,the scientific use of the assessment mechanism,and appropriately expanding the parties′remedies are the direction of the future improvement of the small claims procedures as well as the deepening of civil litigation reform.

关 键 词：小额诉讼程序 适用效果 繁简分流 司法公正 有效区域 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]