检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒙珊珊 何慧萃 李宗蔚 冯启明[1,2] 卢德成 MENG Shanshan;HE Huicui;LI Zongwei;FENG Qiming;LU Decheng(Guangxi Medical University,Health and Policy Research Center(Guangxi High-End Think Tank Construction and Cultivation Unit),Nanning 530021,China;Guangxi Medical University,School of Information and Management,Nanning 530021,China)
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学卫生与健康政策研究中心(广西高端智库建设培育单位),南宁530021 [2]广西医科大学信息与管理学院,南宁530021
出 处:《中国医学教育技术》2024年第5期678-683,共6页China Medical Education Technology
基 金:广西研究生教育创新计划项目(JGY2023090)。
摘 要:目的分析医学研究生科研诚信存在的主要问题,从教育信息化视角提出加强医学研究生科研诚信的建议。方法采用文献研究法梳理医学研究生科研诚信存在的问题,社会网络分析法对梳理得出的问题进行分析,TOPSIS法对基于社会网络分析法计算得出的结果进行综合评价。结果对文献中有关问题进行整理统计得出频次排名前四的问题依次为科研诚信意识淡薄(18次)、伪造篡改数据(15次)、抄袭剽窃他人成果(12次)、导师疏于管理(12次);通过TOPSIS法对社会网络分析法计算得出的结果进行综合评价,排名前四位依次为伪造篡改数据(Ci=0.815)、科研诚信意识淡薄(Ci=0.793)、抄袭剽窃他人成果(Ci=0.788)和导师疏于管理(Ci=0.497)。结论应借助信息技术完善相关管理办法,加强学术监督机制;加强科研诚信教育,提高科研诚信意识;完善导师责任制,杜绝学术不端行为等举措加强医学研究生科研诚信。Objective To analyze the main problems of research integrity of medical post⁃graduates,and propose countermeasures to strengthen the research integrity of medical postgraduates from the perspective of education informatization technology.Methods Literature research method was used to sort out the problems of research integrity of medical postgraduates,social network analy⁃sis method was applied to analyze the problems derived from the sorting out,and TOPSIS method was adopted to make a comprehensive evaluation of the results calculated based on the social network analysis method.Results Through sorting out and analyzing the relevant issues in the literature,the top four issues in terms of frequency are low awareness of research integrity(18 times),falsification and manipulation of data(15 times),plagiarism and plagiarism of others’results(12 times),and negli⁃gence of supervisors(12 times).The comprehensive evaluation of the results calculated by the social network analysis method through TOPSIS method showed that the top four rankings were falsification and tampering with data (Ci=0.815), low awareness of research integrity (Ci=0.793), copying and plagiarism (Ci=0.788), and negligence of supervisors (Ci=0.497). Conclusion Initiatives such as im ⁃ proving the relevant management methods with the help of information technology and strengthening the academic supervision mechanism, strengthening the education of scientific research integrity and raising the awareness of scientific research integrity, improving the responsibility system of tutors and eliminating academic misconduct and so on should be taken to strengthen the research integrity of medical postgraduates.
关 键 词:医学研究生 科研诚信 问题分析 社会网络分析法 TOPSIS法
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112