2023年北京护理学会急诊专科护士培训班考核成绩分析与思考  

Analysis and reflection on examination results of 2023 Beijing Nursing Association Emergency Specialist Nurse Training Course

作　　者：宋莉莉[1] 彭可 茹鸿 鲁寒 翟艳芳[1] 王蕾[2] Song Li;Peng Ke;Ru Hong;Lu Han;Zhai Yanfang;Wang Lei(Emergency Department,Beijing Hospital&National Center of Gerontology,Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China;Nursing Department,Beijing Hospital&National Center of Gerontology,Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Bejing 100730,China)

机构地区：[1]北京医院急诊科国家老年医学中心中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京100730 [2]北京医院护理部国家老年医学中心中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京100730

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2024年第27期3759-3764,共6页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的了解当前北京护理学会急诊专科护士培训班的学习成果和存在问题, 为进一步提高急诊专科护士的教育培训提供参考。方法采用便利抽样法, 选取2023年北京护理学会急诊专科护士培训班的75名学员为调查对象。使用北京护理学会急诊专科护士培训评分标准对学员从理论知识、技能操作、案例分析和综述答辩4个方面进行评分, 并对其存在的问题进行归纳总结和分析。结果共发放问卷75份, 回收有效问卷75份, 问卷有效回收率为100.0%。理论知识得分为(68.4±10.7)分, 最低38.0分, 最高91.0分, 及格率(及格人数/总人数)为81.3%;综述答辩得分为(78.8±5.7)分, 最低65.0分, 最高94.0分, 及格率为100.0%;技能操作得分为(93.5±3.7)分, 最低85.0分, 最高99.0分, 及格率为100.0%;案例分析得分为(90.2±5.6)分, 最低80.0分, 最高100.0分, 及格率为100.0%。理论知识的主要失分原因为机械通气和心肺复苏相关内容;综述答辩的主要失分原因为题目选择和论文写作;技能操作的主要失分原因为操作前准备和操作后相关要点;案例分析的主要失分原因为问诊思路和救治措施。结论急诊专科护士培训班学员目前存在专业实践技能整体较好, 但理论知识掌握差异较大、科学研究能力较为薄弱、分诊决策能力有待提升的现状。建议充分发挥各带教老师优势, 设置多种互联网课程供学员自行学习, 以满足学员的个性化需求并提高教学同质化。Objective To explore the outcomes and problems of the Beijing Nursing Association Emergency Specialist Nurse Training Course,so as to provide reference for improving the training of emergency specialist nurses.Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 75 trainees from the 2023 Beijing Nursing Association Emergency Specialist Nurse Training Course as survey subjects.Beijing Nursing Association Emergency Specialist Nurse Training Scoring Criteria was used to score trainees from four aspects of theoretical knowledge,skill operation,case analysis,and review defense,and to summarize and analyze the existing problems.Results A total of 75 questionnaires were distributed,and 75 valid questionnaires were collected,with a valid response rate of 100.0%.The theoretical knowledge score was(68.4±10.7),with a minimum of 38.0 and a maximum of 91.0,and the pass rate(number of passing trainees divided by the total number of trainees)was 81.3%.The score for the review defense was(78.8±5.7),with a minimum of 65.0 and a maximum of 94.0,and a pass rate of 100.0%.The skill operation score was(93.5±3.7),with a minimum of 85.0 and a maximum of 99.0,and a pass rate of 100.0%.The score for the case analysis was(90.2±5.6),with a minimum score of 80.0 and a maximum score of 100.0,and a pass rate of 100.0%.The main reasons for losing points in the theoretical knowledge were mechanical ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.The main reasons for losing points in the review defense were topic selection and paper writing.The main reasons for losing points in skill operation were preparation before operation and key points after operation.The main reasons for losing points in the case analysis were the consultation ideas and treatment measures.Conclusions The trainees of the emergency specialist nurse training course currently have a relatively good overall professional practical skills,but there are significant differences in theoretical knowledge,weak scientific research capabilities,and room for improvement in triage decision-

关 键 词：急诊科 专科护士 培训 考核 成绩分析 

分 类 号：C975[经济管理—劳动经济] R47-4[医药卫生—护理学]