检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文哲 潘鹏飞 崔建 于湘友[1] Wenzhe Li;Pengfei Pan;Jian Cui;Xiangyou Yu(Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Medical Animal Model Research,Department of Critical Care Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital,Chongqing 404100,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医学动物模型研究重点实验室,新疆医科大学第一附属医院重症医学科,乌鲁木齐830054 [2]重庆大学附属三峡医院重症医学科,重庆404100
出 处:《中华重症医学电子杂志》2024年第2期97-101,共5页Chinese Journal Of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition)
基 金:国家重点研发计划“常见多发病防治研究”“十四五”重点专项所属项目(脓毒症多器官功能障碍早期识别和动态风险预警体系研究)(2021YFC2500800);重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX1069)。
摘 要:体外生命支持(ECLS)技术的发展推动了现代医学的进步,为诸多疾病的救治提供了有效支撑,同时也引发了新的医学伦理学论题。ECLS的获益评价、资源分配和治疗终点等方面的伦理学论题逐步成为医患双方甚至全社会共同面临的困境。明晰并以患者利益为中心提出此类伦理学矛盾的最优解需要多方的协同促进与监督,由此维护医学的公平和对患者的尊重。本文针对ECLS应用相关的伦理学现状进行回顾总结,以期为ECLS的合理应用提供伦理学参考。The technological and scientific development of extracorporeal life support(ECLS)has promoted the progress of modern medicine,provided an effective platform for the treatment of critical diseases,and raised new medical ethics issues at the same time.Ethical issues such as treatment benefit,resource allocation,and treatment endpoints of ECLS have become a dilemma faced by the whole society,especially doctors and patients.Proposing a solution to such ethical issues based on the interests of patients requires the coordinated promotion and supervision of multiple parties so as to maintain fairness and respect for patients in medicine.This review summarizes the evidence of the current ethical issues with ECLS in order to provide a reference for clinicians optimizing the application of ECLS.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49