检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭泽强[1] 王宣博 Guo Zeqiang;Wang Xuanbo(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《湖北警官学院学报》2024年第4期69-79,共11页Journal of Hubei University of Police
基 金:2023年中南财经政法大学基本科研项目“习近平法治思想指引下的国家安全法治建设研究”(2722023EJ021)。
摘 要:当前帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的适用量大幅上升。引发这一趋势的原因之一在于司法实践未能妥善区分帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪。目前学界有关上述两罪名的区分标准存在时间标准说、构成要件说、查证程度说三种理论学说,这三种学说均只关注了两罪在某一方面的差异,并仅针对特定方面提出区分标准,难以解决帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪的区分问题。要实现帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪的有效界分,需坚持以符合构成要件作为形式标准,以罪名保护法益为实质标准,以主客观相统一为评价标准,并以疑罪唯轻原则为证明标准的综合区分标准。Currently,the application rate of the crime of helping information network crime has increased significantly.One of the reasons for this trend may be that judicial practice fails to properly distinguish between the crime of helping information network crime and the offense of covering up and concealing the crime.At present,there are three theoretical theories about the distinction standards of the above two crimes,namely,the theory of time standard,the theory of constitutive elements and the theory of degree of verification.These three theories only focus on the differences of the two crimes in a certain aspect,and only put forward the distinction standards for specific aspects,which is difficult to adapt to the complexity of the distinction between the crime of helping information network crime and the crime of covering up and concealing.In order to realize the effective distinction between the crime of helping the information network crime and the crime of covering up and concealing,it is necessary to adhere to the comprehensive distinction standard of meeting the constitutive requirements as the formal standard,having legal interest infringement as the substantive standard,the unification of subject and objective as the evaluation standard,and the principle of the presumption of guilt as the proof standard.
关 键 词:帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 主客观相统一 疑罪唯轻 证明标准
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.162.18