维特根斯坦中期的元哲学是“治疗型”的吗?——对李国山立场的回应  

Is the Wittgenstein’s Middle Metaphilosophy“Therapeutic”?:Response to Li Guoshan’s Position

作　　者：徐强 Xu Qiang

机构地区：[1]西南民族大学哲学学院

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期51-58,201,共9页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“‘新维特根斯坦学派’研究”(21BZX097)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：李国山基于对有关维特根斯坦中期哲学遗作的理解,认为其元哲学是“治疗型”的,而其“治疗型”哲学包括诊断和治疗。但是,从连续性视角考察中期维特根斯坦有关哲学本质讨论的两个“面相”,其中期的元哲学观点跟早期的元哲学观点存在实质连续性,其早期认为哲学研究的主要内容在于考察命题的本质,中期仍然认为哲学研究的核心在于考察命题的本质,只不过他所使用的方法和视角有所转变,即把语法研究作为方法、把考察命题各式各样的用法作为主要内容,因此,其中期的元哲学不是“治疗型”的。李国山对维特根斯坦中期元哲学的解读只抓住了其中期哲学的其中一个“面相”,他的理解是部分受到了新维特根斯坦学派的影响。实际上,哲学研究作为语法研究才是维特根斯坦中期元哲学的根基。Based on his understanding of the posthumous works of Middle Wittgenstein,Li Guoshan argued that his metaphilosophy is“therapeutic”,encompassing both diagnosis and treatment.However,from the perspective of continuity,examining the two“aspects”of Wittgenstein’s Middle discussion on the nature of philosophy reveals substantial continuity between his early and middle metaphilosophical views.In his early period,Wittgenstein believed that the main content of philosophical research was the examination of the nature of propositions.In his middle period,he still considered the core of philosophical research to be the examination of the nature of propositions,although his methods and perspectives had shifted.He adopted grammatical research as a method and focused on examining the various uses of propositions.Therefore,the metaphilosophy of Middle Wittgenstein is not“therapeutic”.Li Guoshan’s interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Middle metaphilosophy captures only one“aspect”of his middle philosophy and is partially influenced by the New Wittgenstein School.In fact,philosophical research as grammatical research is the foundation of Wittgenstein’s middle metaphilosophy.

关 键 词：维特根斯坦中期哲学 “治疗型”哲学 哲学语法 新维特根斯坦学派 

分 类 号：B561.59[哲学宗教—外国哲学]