对于being的哲学与后哲学的两种理解——读王路教授的《Being与汉译哲学》  

Two Interpretations of Being from the Perspectives of Philosophy and Post-philosophy On Being and Philosophy in Chinese Translation by Wang Lu

作　　者：尚杰[1] Shang Jie

机构地区：[1]郑州大学哲学学院

出　　处：《世界哲学》2024年第5期53-63,160,共12页World Philosophy

摘　　要：对于being的理解涉及西方哲学的核心,它直接对应“是”,不仅连接“是什么”,而且“是”本身作为系动词出现,对应拼音文字系统。“是”的范围大于“存在”,“是”包含了“存在”,但“存在”无法还原为系词。在后哲学的理解中,表现为对于“being”及其“是什么”提问方式的质疑。从胡塞尔到德里达,怀疑“是什么”的理论态度模式,引入观看、空间等异质因素,从论证性的哲学导致描述性的哲学,实现了哲学的当代转折。The understanding of"being"goes to the heart of Western philosophy,and it corresponds directly to the word"to be",not only in connection with"to be what",but also as a copulative verb in its own right,corresponding to the phonetic writing system.The scope of"to be"is larger than that of"being",because"to be"implies"existence",but""existence"cannot be reduced to"to be",the copula.In post-philosophical understanding,this is manifested in the questioning of the way"being"and"to be"is asked.From Husserl to Derrida,a contemporary turn in philosophy was achieved by questioning the mode of theoretical attitude of"to be what",introducing heterogeneous factors such as viewing and space,and leading from argumentative philosophy to descriptive philosophy.

关 键 词：BEING 拼音语言 汉语 系词 存在 

分 类 号：B5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]