检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙志远 Sun Zhiyuan(Shenzhen Baoliyuan Environmental Water Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Shenzhen,China)
出 处:《科学技术创新》2024年第22期169-172,共4页Scientific and Technological Innovation
摘 要:为了准确评估地铁工程在洪涝灾害中的安全性,本文深入探讨了研究区域概况,包括项目背景、流域及水文特点,以及项目设计标准。在此基础上,文章详细介绍了三种不同的洪涝水位计算方法:断面水位计算法、容积法以及Mike数值模型,并对每种方法的特点和适用性进行了详细分析。通过对不同计算方法的对比研究,本文发现各种方法在计算精度、数据需求以及操作复杂性等方面各有优劣。研究结果表明,根据具体工程条件和数据可得性,选择合适的计算方法对地铁工程洪涝水位进行准确评估至关重要。本文为地铁工程洪涝风险评估提供了有力的技术支撑和方法指导。In order to accurately evaluate the safety of subway engineering in flood disasters,this article delves into the overview of the research area,including project background,watershed and hydrological characteristics,as well as project design standards.On this basis,the article provides a detailed introduction to three different flood water level calculation methods:cross-sectional water level calculation method,volumetric method,and Mike numerical model,and analyzes the characteristics and applicability of each method in detail.Through comparative research on different calculation methods,this article finds that each method has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of calculation accuracy,data requirements,and operational complexity.The research results indicate that selecting appropriate calculation methods based on specific engineering conditions and data availability is crucial for accurately evaluating the flood level of subway engineering.This article provides strong technical support and methodological guidance for flood risk assessment in subway engineering.
关 键 词:地铁工程 洪涝水位 断面水位计算法 容积法 Mike数值模型
分 类 号:P426.6[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7