检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋逸天 Jiang Yitian
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院 [2]教育部-东南大学教育立法研究基地
出 处:《法学教育研究》2024年第3期339-355,共17页
摘 要:自《民法典》颁布以来,教育法典编纂工作成为教育法学界关注的核心议题之一。理论上看,教育法法典化蕴含着体系化、科学化与权利保障等诸多理想图景,具有相应理论必要性。然而,在具体方法论层面,教育法法典化工作存在诸多理论分歧,有待加以系统性梳理。在教育法典与行政法典的关系上,存在从属关系不清、内容关系不清与制定顺序不清等问题;在体例结构上,存在编纂模式不清和体例中轴不清等问题;在覆盖范围上,存在诸多相异主张。为此,应当秉持教育法典“相对独立性”的基本立场,协调教育法典与行政法典的内容范围,推动两者同步制定;采用体系性法典编纂模式,将受教育权保障作为教育法典的体例中轴;进一步厘清教育法典的覆盖范围。Since the promulgation of the Civil Code,the compilation of the Education Code has become one of the core issues of concern in the field of education law.Theoretically,the codification of education law contains many ideal prospects such as systematization,scientization and rights protection,which is of corresponding theoretical necessity.However,at the level of specific methodology,there are many theoretical differences in the codification of education law,which need to be systematically sorted out.In terms of the relationship between the Education Code and the Administrative Code,there are issues such as unclear affiliation,unclear content relationship,and unclear formulation order;In terms of style and structure,there are issues such as unclear compilation patterns and unclear axes in the style,and there are many different opinions in terms of coverage.Therefore,we should uphold the basic position of“relative independence”of the Education Code,coordinate the content scope of the Education Code and the Administrative Code,and promote the simultaneous formulation of the two;Adopting a systematic codification model,taking the protection of the right to education as the central axis of the education code;Further clarify the coverage of the Education Code.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.188.157