汉语实词分类原理与教学中的价值——从“名动包含”说开去  

Analysis of Part of Speech Debate and the Value of Content Words Classification in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language

作　　者：吴长安[1] WU Chang-an

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学国际汉学院,长春130024

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2024年第5期190-202,239,240,共15页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家语委重点项目(ZDI145-2)。

摘　　要：沈家煊先生多年来致力于“名动包含”说的研究,取得了令人瞩目的成果,但在一些问题上仍有可商榷之处,如“木桶理论”的适用性、定义的前提性、结构分析的确定与不确定、简单原则如何把握、“名动包含”说的哲学来源、语言事实如何认识等。针对这些问题,我们有自己的认识。汉语为母语的社团至少有两个意识:一是在听到新词时凭借自己的经验或词语标记进行“类推”的意识;二是根据一个词语在表达中所处的语法位置进行“类化”的意识。这是词类形成的语言基础,而汉语词类认识还远远未到尽头。从理论应该指导实践来说,现今的留学生教学还无法在“名动包含”的框架下进行,名、动、形分类有其课堂教学的重要价值。Mr.Shen Jiaxuan has been dedicated to the study of the theory of“noun verb inclusion”for many years,and has achieved remarkable results.However,there are still areas for discussion on some issues,such as the applicability of the“barrel theory”,the premise of definition,the determination and uncertainty of structural analysis,how to grasp simple principles,the philosophical origin of the“noun verb inclusion”theory,and how to understand linguistic facts.We have our own understanding of these issues.From a theoretical perspective,it should guide practice.Currently,in the teaching of international students,it is not possible to do so within the framework of“noun verb inclusion”.The classification of noun verb forms has classroom teaching value.

关 键 词：“名动包含” 词类论争 实词分类 对外汉语教学 词类教学 

分 类 号：H195[语言文字—汉语]